Skip to main content

Table 4 Average rank scores for the different methods on simulated datasets, measured using the modeller scores

From: Efficient representation of uncertainty in multiple sequence alignments using directed acyclic graphs

  Low indel rate Medium indel rate High indel rate
  \(\boldsymbol {{\alpha ^{m}_{C}}}\) \(\boldsymbol {\alpha ^{m}_{C^{+}}}\) \(\boldsymbol {{\alpha ^{m}_{C}}}\) \(\boldsymbol {\alpha ^{m}_{C^{+}}}\) \(\boldsymbol {{\alpha ^{m}_{C}}}\) \(\boldsymbol {\alpha ^{m}_{C^{+}}}\)
MinRisk (C), g=0 0.92 0.91 0.96 0.95 0.89 0.92
MinRisk (C), g=0.5 0.93 0.88 0.97 0.80 0.90 0.35
MinRisk (C), g=1 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.65 0.87 0.23
MinRisk (C +), g=0 0.69 0.88 0.62 0.96 0.56 1.00
MinRisk (C +), g=0.5 0.90 0.94 0.95 0.97 0.88 0.96
MinRisk (C +), g=1 0.93 0.92 0.95 0.91 0.88 0.74
MergeAlign 0.74 0.57 0.85 0.67 0.78 0.63
S-Coffee 0.15 0.05 0.22 0.03 0.37 0.00
  1. Highest values for each column shown in bold.