Skip to main content

Table 4 Average rank scores for the different methods on simulated datasets, measured using the modeller scores

From: Efficient representation of uncertainty in multiple sequence alignments using directed acyclic graphs

 

Low indel rate

Medium indel rate

High indel rate

 

\(\boldsymbol {{\alpha ^{m}_{C}}}\)

\(\boldsymbol {\alpha ^{m}_{C^{+}}}\)

\(\boldsymbol {{\alpha ^{m}_{C}}}\)

\(\boldsymbol {\alpha ^{m}_{C^{+}}}\)

\(\boldsymbol {{\alpha ^{m}_{C}}}\)

\(\boldsymbol {\alpha ^{m}_{C^{+}}}\)

MinRisk (C), g=0

0.92

0.91

0.96

0.95

0.89

0.92

MinRisk (C), g=0.5

0.93

0.88

0.97

0.80

0.90

0.35

MinRisk (C), g=1

0.95

0.85

0.96

0.65

0.87

0.23

MinRisk (C +), g=0

0.69

0.88

0.62

0.96

0.56

1.00

MinRisk (C +), g=0.5

0.90

0.94

0.95

0.97

0.88

0.96

MinRisk (C +), g=1

0.93

0.92

0.95

0.91

0.88

0.74

MergeAlign

0.74

0.57

0.85

0.67

0.78

0.63

S-Coffee

0.15

0.05

0.22

0.03

0.37

0.00

  1. Highest values for each column shown in bold.