Figure 5

SimBA comparison results. (a) Sensitivity comparison with existing methods, comparing the results for two very similar populations ASW and LWK. SimBA hill climbing was run with k=6 for ASW, and k=10 for LWK. (b-e) Comparing existing methods on the JPT/CHB population. Results from 10 runs are shown as lines, while red “o” are the target and blue “*” are the average values across the runs. Sum of squared distances between average simulated and target values is shown for each method. SimBA hill climbing was run with k=10.