Table 4 Performance comparison according to structural class
| Â | CATH-based predictions | SCOP-based predictions | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Targets | Class (Total # of templates) | Targets with better GDT | Targets with both better GDT & RMSD | Class (Total # of templates) | Targets with better GDT | Targets with both better GDT & RMSD |
16 | Mainly Alpha (10194) | 75.0% | 62.5% | All Alpha (4807) | 75.0% | 56.3% |
18 | Mainly Beta (10532) | 61.1% | 38.9% | All Beta (7534) | 77.8% | 55.6% |
33 (29+ 4) | Alpha Beta (22685) | 75.8% | 63.6% | Alpha + Beta (7824) | 86.2% | 65.6% |
Alpha / Beta (9186) | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||||
3 | Few Secondary Structures (531) | 33.3% | 0.0% | Small Proteins (853) | 66.6% | 66.6% |
70 | All | 68.6% | 54.3% | All | 81.4% | 62.9% |