Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | BMC Bioinformatics

Fig. 4

From: A composite genome approach to identify phylogenetically informative data from next-generation sequencing

Fig. 4

SISRS identified fewer informative sites for deeper nodes in the tree; however, some sites identified each split in all cases except for extremely diverged species with low-coverage data. Results are separated by branch length (panels), coverage (x axis), and tree depth (symbols). Only results for the equal-branch-length ladder tree are shown; results for the other ladder trees were similar (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The number of sites supporting the node A+B are denoted as ∘; △ denotes sites supporting A+B+C; ■ denotes A+B+C+D; \(\blacktriangle \) denotes A+B+C+D+E; ∗ denotes A+B+C+D+E+F; ∙ denotes A+B+C+D+E+F+G. Note that these symbols refer to different results that the previous figure. Fewer sites were recovered for the tree with short deep branches, compared to the equal-branch-length tree, while more sites were recovered for the tree with long branches

Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us