Control | Novel sets | Conventional sets |
---|
| COPR sets | REG sets | KEGG+GO sets |
Randomized |
↑ better |
↑ better |
↑ same (p=1) |
| (p=0.02950) | (p=0.0186) | |
Gene-level |
↑ better |
↑ better |
↑ worse (p=0.00254) |
| (p=0.01776) | (p=0.03809) | |
- Both the selected types of the newly proposed gene sets (i.e., COPR and REG) perform significantly better than their randomized and gene-level versions. On the contrary, the state-of-the-art gene set type (KEGG+GO) performs indistinguishably from its randomized version and significantly worse than its gene-level version. As detailed in main text, the p-values correspond to the one-sided paired Wilcoxon test applied on the win/tie/loss counts determined by leave-one-out cross-validation of predictive accuracies