BMC Bioinformatics

Table 2 Means of the metric values and of their ranks among the different methods over the 14 studied datasets separated into method for the following metrics: sepscore, avedist, klmetr and pvca

From: Combining location-and-scale batch effect adjustment with data cleaning by latent factor adjustment

sepscore
Mean values	combat	fabatch	stand	sva	meanc	ratiog	ratioa	none
	0.09895	0.10227	0.13238	0.15217	0.15807	0.16618	0.18314	0.2806
Mean ranks	combat	fabatch	stand	sva	meanc	ratiog	ratioa	none
	2.28571	3.35714	3.71429	4.42857	4.64286	4.78571	5.92857	6.85714
avedist
Mean values	meanc	ratiog	ratioa	combat	stand	fabatch	sva	none
	233.32619	235.27321	235.39525	235.52757	237.86855	239.53197	240.55365	243.10948
Mean ranks	meanc	combat	ratiog	ratioa	fabatch	stand	none	sva
	3.07143	3.57143	3.57143	3.57143	5.14286	5.21429	5.78571	6.07143
klmetr
Mean values	fabatch	combat	stand	sva	meanc	ratioa	ratiog	none
	0.32312	0.33748	0.35524	1.08835	1.13029	1.15025	1.23577	2.85956
Mean ranks	combat	fabatch	stand	sva	meanc	ratioa	ratiog	none
	2.85714	3	3.14286	4.57143	4.71429	4.92857	5.42857	7.35714
pvca
Mean values	sva	combat	meanc	ratioa	ratiog	stand	fabatch	none
	0.06364	0.06015	0.05636	0.0502	0.04933	0.04741	0.04569	0.04477
Mean ranks	sva	combat	meanc	ratioa	stand	ratiog	fabatch	none
	2.92857	3.14286	3.57143	5	5.07143	5.21429	5.35714	5.71429

In each row the results are listed in descending order according to mean performance in terms of the original values and their ranks, respectively. The results of FAbatch are printed in bold

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com