Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | BMC Bioinformatics

Fig. 6

From: PTESFinder: a computational method to identify post-transcriptional exon shuffling (PTES) events

Fig. 6

Comparisons with real RNAseq data & published results. a Approximately 64 % (4675) of PTES transcripts utilising 2 RefSeq (known) splice sites were identified by both circRNA_finder and PTESFinder from SRR444975 (b) Read exclusion criteria for PTES transcripts identified by circRNA_finder only, when analysed by PTESFinder (c) Distribution of read numbers supporting PTES transcripts identified by circRNA_finder only, by PTESFinder only, and by both (raw counts reported by PTESFinder shown) (d) PTESFinder identified over 50 % (1052) of transcripts reported in Memczak et al. [14]. e The majority of the 898 structures reported by Memczak et al. [14] but not identified by PTESFinder are intronic or intergenic. f Exclusion criteria for reads presented as evidence for exonic structures in Memczak et al. [14] which were not reported by PTESFinder (see text)

Back to article page