Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | BMC Bioinformatics

Fig. 1

From: Systematic evaluation of the impact of ChIP-seq read designs on genome coverage, peak identification, and allele-specific binding detection

Fig. 1

Alignment rate and accuracy of actual and simulated data. a Coverage of repeat elements in a MAFK dataset. Total lengths of the reads that overlapped repeat elements are normalized by the total lengths of the repeat elements. b False positive rates of a CTCF dataset based on the relaxed alignment set (BWAq20o1n8 on PE101). c and d Alignment rate vs. accuracy of simulation data for Bowtie and BWA, respectively. x and y axis are percentages of aligned reads and correctly aligned reads. Medians across five replicates are reported for each comparison

Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us