Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptions of the design and alignment combinations that are compared throughout the paper

From: Systematic evaluation of the impact of ChIP-seq read designs on genome coverage, peak identification, and allele-specific binding detection

Aim

Comparisons

Compare PE and SE designs with the same number of fragments, similar numbers of sequenced bases, and read error rates

PE36v1 vs SE75v2 and PE50v1 vs SE101v2

Compare PE and SE designs with the same numbers of reads, sequenced bases, and read error rates

PE36v1half vs SE36v1

Compare PE and SE designs with the same number of fragments, read-lengths, and read error rates

PE36v1 vs SE36v1, PE50v1 vs SE50v1, PE75v2 vs SE75v2 and PE101v2 vs SE101v2

Compare long and short PE reads with the same number of fragments and similar read error rates

PE36v1 vs PE75v2 and PE50v1 vs PE101v2

Compare long and short SE reads with the same number of fragments and similar read error rates

SE36v1 vs SE75v2 and SE50v1 vs SE101v2