Skip to main content

Advertisement

Fig. 6 | BMC Bioinformatics

Fig. 6

From: Illumina error profiles: resolving fine-scale variation in metagenomic sequencing data

Fig. 6

Comparison of error rates for different correction methods: Overall substitution error rates split by sequencing platform and library preparation method. The grey bars display the error rates of the raw reads. The red bars represent the error rates after quality trimming with sickle (minimum quality score: 20, minimum read length: 10) and the yellow bars represent the results after error correction with BayesHammer. The results of the combination of both methods are displayed by the blue bars. (Error rates [0,1] are measured as errors per base.)

Back to article page