Skip to main content

Table 2 Pairwise comparison of different models using cis-enrichment and trans-enrichment

From: Sparse regression models for unraveling group and individual associations in eQTL mapping

  

FaST-LMM

geQTL-ridge

SET-eQTL

MTLasso2G

LORS

Matrix eQTL

Lasso

cis

geQTL +

<0.0163

0.0124

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

 

FaST-LMM

-

0.0247

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

 

geQTL-ridge

-

-

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

 

SET-eQTL

-

-

-

0.0117

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

 

MTLasso2G

-

-

-

-

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

 

LORS

-

-

-

-

-

<0.0001

0.0052

 

Matrix eQTL

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.0134

  

MTLasso2G

FaST-LMM

LORS

SET-eQTL

Matrix eQTL

Lasso

geQTL-ridge

trans

geQTL +

0.0042

0.0040

0.0033

0.0029

0.0027

0.0022

0.0001

 

MTLasso2G

-

0.0212

0.0134

0.0049

0.0042

0.0038

0.0005

 

FaST-LMM

-

-

0.0233

0.0178

0.0125

0.0073

0.0006

 

LORS

-

-

-

0.3110

0.1103

0.0151

0.0008

 

SET-eQTL

-

-

-

-

0.1223

0.0578

0.0016

 

Matrix eQTL

-

-

-

-

-

0.0672

0.0021

 

Lasso

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.0025