Skip to main content

Table 2 Pairwise comparison of different models using cis-enrichment and trans-enrichment

From: Sparse regression models for unraveling group and individual associations in eQTL mapping

   FaST-LMM geQTL-ridge SET-eQTL MTLasso2G LORS Matrix eQTL Lasso
cis geQTL + <0.0163 0.0124 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
  FaST-LMM - 0.0247 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
  geQTL-ridge - - <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
  SET-eQTL - - - 0.0117 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
  MTLasso2G - - - - <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
  LORS - - - - - <0.0001 0.0052
  Matrix eQTL - - - - - - 0.0134
   MTLasso2G FaST-LMM LORS SET-eQTL Matrix eQTL Lasso geQTL-ridge
trans geQTL + 0.0042 0.0040 0.0033 0.0029 0.0027 0.0022 0.0001
  MTLasso2G - 0.0212 0.0134 0.0049 0.0042 0.0038 0.0005
  FaST-LMM - - 0.0233 0.0178 0.0125 0.0073 0.0006
  LORS - - - 0.3110 0.1103 0.0151 0.0008
  SET-eQTL - - - - 0.1223 0.0578 0.0016
  Matrix eQTL - - - - - 0.0672 0.0021
  Lasso - - - - - - 0.0025