Skip to main content

Table 2 Median error rates in mutation screening data using shadow linear regression and smoothing spline approachesa

From: Empirical estimation of sequencing error rates using smoothing splines

Samples

Expected ER

SRER

SRER Bias

EER_CS

EER_CS Bias

EER_RS

EER_RS Bias

SRR032565

0.1991

0.0493

0.1498

0.1080

0.0911

0.1082

0.0910

SRR032566

0.0734

0.0412

0.0323

0.0705

0.0029

0.0705

0.0029

SRR032567

0.2003

0.0542

0.1461

0.1111

0.0892

0.1111

0.0893

SRR032568

0.2040

0.0437

0.1603

0.1057

0.0984

0.1072

0.0968

SRR032569

0.1598

0.0509

0.1089

0.1018

0.0580

0.1014

0.0585

SRR032570

0.0985

0.0641

0.0345

0.0959

0.0026

0.0954

0.0032

SRR032571

0.1236

0.0575

0.0661

0.1406

0.0170

0.1406

0.0170

SRR032572

0.1495

0.0530

0.0965

0.1181

0.0314

0.1173

0.0323

SRR032573

0.1779

0.0912

0.0867

0.1518

0.0261

0.1506

0.0273

SRR032574

0.0986

0.0384

0.0602

0.0626

0.0361

0.0618

0.0368

SRR032575

0.1169

0.0839

0.0330

0.1228

0.0059

0.1227

0.0058

SRR032576

0.1554

0.0945

0.0609

0.1887

0.0333

0.1880

0.0326

SRR032577

0.1052

0.0694

0.0359

0.1054

0.0002

0.1055

0.0002

SRR032578

0.1143

0.0448

0.0695

0.1077

0.0067

0.1076

0.0067

SRR032580

0.0870

0.0619

0.0251

0.1169

0.0298

0.1163

0.0292

SRR032581

0.0770

0.0347

0.0424

0.0752

0.0018

0.0751

0.0019

SRR032582

0.0400

0.0041

0.0359

0.0309

0.0091

0.0310

0.0090

SRR032583

0.1224

0.0707

0.0517

0.1279

0.0055

0.1280

0.0056

SRR032584

0.1290

0.0540

0.0750

0.1052

0.0238

0.1032

0.0259

SRR032586

0.0445

0.0102

0.0343

0.0287

0.0158

0.0287

0.0159

SRR032587

0.1486

0.0786

0.0700

0.1562

0.0076

0.1552

0.0066

SRR032588

0.1240

0.0470

0.0770

0.1024

0.0216

0.1021

0.0220

SRR033543

0.1151

0.0587

0.0564

0.0828

0.0323

0.0832

0.0318

SRR033544

0.1267

0.0524

0.0743

0.1086

0.0181

0.1085

0.0182

  1. aBased on 1000 replicates. The frequency-based simulation approach was applied. For each replicate, we considered the top 1000 reads with the highest frequencies as the error-free reads and generated 1000 pairs of error-free read counts and shadow counts
  2. Expected ER expected error rate in simulation studies
  3. SRER error rate estimated using shadow regression
  4. SRER Bias the absolute value of the difference between SRER and Expected ER
  5. EER_CS empirical error rate estimated using cubic smoothing spline
  6. EER_CS Bias the absolute value of the difference between EER_CS and Expected ER
  7. EER_RS empirical error rate estimated using robust smoothing spline
  8. EER_RS Bias the absolute value of the difference between EER_RS and Expected ER