Skip to main content

Table 2 Differences using only ACMG genes are also minimal

From: Evaluating the necessity of PCR duplicate removal from next-generation sequencing data and a comparison of approaches

Subset

Total Variants

Ti/Tv Ratio

% Variants in dbSNP

Avg. Population Frequency

% Protein Changing Variants

 All Picard

34285

2.29

67.75

0.20

1.08

 All SAMTools

34412

2.29

67.51

0.20

1.08

 All No Dups

34531

2.29

67.34

0.20

1.07

P-Value

0.64

1.00

0.99

1.00

1.00

Common to all three

34000

2.31

76.37

0.20

1.09

 Unique to Picard

261

1.01

19.64

0.88

0

 Unique to SAMTools

2

1.00

0

NA

0

 Unique to No Dups

115

1.54

22.33

0.04

0

 Unique to Picard/SAMTools

9

1.50

40

0.03

0

 Unique to Picard/No Dups

15

1.00

0

NA

0

 Unique to SAMTools/No Dups

401

0.98

15.86

0.12

0.32

P-Value (comparing Unique rows)

<2.60e-16

0.998

1.04e-13

0.74

0.90

  1. We performed the same analyses using only the ACMG genes and found similar results