Skip to main content

Table 3 Result of pruning strategy

From: A method for exploring implicit concept relatedness in biomedical knowledge network

  Pruning mask Edges Average count Average percentage
No Mask R all (1,0,0)a 971,585 1054.6 100 %
Mask 1 R 1(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0)b 969,001 566 26.78 %
Mask 2 R 2(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0) 971,501 460.5 22.77 %
Mask 3 R 3(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0) 964,792 90.7 4.22 %
Mask 4 R 4(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0) 965,000 124 46.65 %
Mask 5 R 5(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0) 965,000 66.6 8.94 %
Mask 6 R 6(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0) 810,489 1.5 0.21 %
Mask 7 R 7(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0) 810,489 954.6 53.17 %
Mask 8 R 9(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0) 965,189 27.9 2.96 %
Mask 9 R all (1,0,0.4) 965,718 753.3 63.01 %
Mask 10 R 8(1,0.4,0) 382,972 4.5 0.24 %
Mask 11 R 1(0,0,0),R rest (1,0.2,0.35) 615,921 136.7 19.56 %
Mask 12 R 5(0,0,0),R rest (1,0.2,0) 615,179 476.5 20.57 %
  1. a R all indicates all types of relationships
  2. b R rest indicates rest of the types of relationships