Skip to main content

Table 3 Result of pruning strategy

From: A method for exploring implicit concept relatedness in biomedical knowledge network

 

Pruning mask

Edges

Average count

Average percentage

No Mask

R all (1,0,0)a

971,585

1054.6

100 %

Mask 1

R 1(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0)b

969,001

566

26.78 %

Mask 2

R 2(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0)

971,501

460.5

22.77 %

Mask 3

R 3(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0)

964,792

90.7

4.22 %

Mask 4

R 4(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0)

965,000

124

46.65 %

Mask 5

R 5(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0)

965,000

66.6

8.94 %

Mask 6

R 6(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0)

810,489

1.5

0.21 %

Mask 7

R 7(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0)

810,489

954.6

53.17 %

Mask 8

R 9(0,0,0),R rest (1,0,0)

965,189

27.9

2.96 %

Mask 9

R all (1,0,0.4)

965,718

753.3

63.01 %

Mask 10

R 8(1,0.4,0)

382,972

4.5

0.24 %

Mask 11

R 1(0,0,0),R rest (1,0.2,0.35)

615,921

136.7

19.56 %

Mask 12

R 5(0,0,0),R rest (1,0.2,0)

615,179

476.5

20.57 %

  1. a R all indicates all types of relationships
  2. b R rest indicates rest of the types of relationships