Skip to main content

Table 5 Speed comparison

From: NEAT: an efficient network enrichment analysis test

Test Software Simulation S4 Simulation S5
NEAT R package neat 0.6 0.7
NEA R package neaGUI 2125.4 2151.5
LP CrossTalkZ 28.6 44.7
LA CrossTalkZ 14.4 18.0
LA+S CrossTalkZ 21.8 27.6
NP CrossTalkZ 12.9 15.8
  1. The table compares the time (in seconds) that each method required to compute 1225 tests for enrichment in simulations S4 and S5, using a processor with 2.5 GhZ CPU frequency. NEAT turns out to be by far the fastest method