Skip to main content

Table 3 Methods comparison on G Switch Proteins

From: Protein secondary structure prediction using a small training set (compact model) combined with a Complex-valued neural network approach

Method Observed j   Predicted j   Q j (%) Q 3 (%)
   H E C   
  H 680 0 42 94.19  
SSP 55 E 25 384 137 70.33 80.36
  C 51 20 61 46.22  
  H 665 19 38 92.11  
FLOPRED E 41 380 125 69.6 78.72
  C 49 26 57 43.19  
  H 556 50 116 77.01  
PROTEUS 2 E 17 302 227 55.32 61.72
  C 2 124 6 4.55  
  H 519 99 104 71.89  
PSIPRED E 167 243 136 44.51 57.36
  C 5 86 41 31.07  
  H 405 99 218 56.1  
PORTER 4.0 E 22 267 257 48.91 51.08
  C 0 89 43 32.58  
  H 473 95 154 65.52  
SPIDER2 E 112 213 221 39.02 50.79
  C 0 107 25 18.94  
  H 368 162 192 50.97  
SSPRO E 13 312 221 57.15 50.43
  C 1 105 26 19.7