Skip to main content

Table 2 Number of conserved interactions (CI) obtained by different network alignment algorithms

From: Effective comparative analysis of protein-protein interaction networks by measuring the steady-state network flow using a Markov model

 

Yeast – Fly

Yeast – Worm

Yeast – Human

Yeast – Mouse

Fly – Worm

CUFID-align

1,721

486

3,421

56

347

SMETANA-CSRW

337

110

2,468

31

107

SMETANA

504

171

2,377

37

116

PINALOG

2,982

1,000

6,231

225

666

HubAlign

836

4,013

2,659

545

3,276

IsoRank

1,436

764

3,165

176

558

BLAST-MWBM

246

89

1,317

14

70

 

Fly – Human

Fly – Mouse

Worm – Mouse

Worm – Human

Human – Mouse

CUFID-align

1,547

59

18

459

318

SMETANA-CSRW

710

41

8

198

336

SMETANA

965

50

16

283

337

PINALOG

2,730

88

47

917

358

HubAlign

9,317

491

459

3,743

532

IsoRank

1,471

106

130

569

350

BLAST-MWBM

441

12

2

138

253

Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us