Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluation on simulated data

From: A fast read alignment method based on seed-and-vote for next generation sequencing

Tool

sTime(s)

sConf(%)

sErr(%)

pTime(s)

pConf(%)

pErr(%)

BWA-MEM-125

581

96.2

0.030

642

97.8

0.018

Subread-125

227

93.5

0.896

204

95.8

1.268

FSVA-125

170

93.5

0.014

150

95.4

0.041

Bowtie2-125

792

94.9

0.020

772

94.9

0.297

BWA-MEM-150

748

96.7

0.023

737

98.0

0.012

Subread-150

271

95.0

0.728

246

96.9

1.054

FSVA-150

188

95.0

0.014

173

96.2

0.035

Bowtie2-150

966

95.0

0.015

929

94.9

0.260

  1. Except in the ‘Tool’ column, the left three columns starting with ‘s’ represent the performance on single-end data, and the right three columns starting with ‘p’ represent the performance on pair-end data. ‘sTime’, ‘sConf’, ‘sErr’ refer to time cost, confident mapping percent and error rate correspondingly for single-end data. In the first element of each row, such as ‘BWA-MEM-125’, the number 125 following the tool name BWA-MEM represents read length for this test. All the experiments were run on a single core Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz