Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance of the proposed combined methods on the 9 types of ligands over five-fold cross-validation and comparison with COACH

From: Protein ligand-specific binding residue predictions by an ensemble classifier

Ligand Method Accuracy (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) MCC
CU TargetCom 99.21 57.94 99.78 0.67
COACH 98.86 61.12 99.39 0.59
FE TargetCom 98.73 59.73 99.32 0.58
COACH 97.95 66.82 98.42 0.50
FE2 TargetCom 99.27 67.73 99.68 0.70
COACH 99.20 62.41 99.67 0.66
ZN TargetCom 98.99 56.18 99.50 0.56
COACH 98.65 57.38 99.14 0.50
SO4 TargetCom 97.72 15.11 99.48 0.23
COACH 97.21 19.15 98.87 0.21
PO4 TargetCom 97.99 32.03 99.26 0.37
COACH 97.52 35.33 98.72 0.34
ATP TargetCom 97.17 59.26 98.54 0.58
COACH 96.99 56.27 98.46 0.55
FMN TargetCom 97.66 79.61 98.58 0.76
COACH 96.75 70.36 98.11 0.66
HEME TargetCom 94.96 69.92 97.07 0.66
COACH 94.48 61.60 97.25 0.60