Skip to main content

Table 6 Performance of all methods on the “hard” target proteins over each type of ligand

From: Protein ligand-specific binding residue predictions by an ensemble classifier

Ligand

Na

Method

Accuracy (%)

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

MCC (%)b

CU

3

TargetCom

98.76

16.67

1

23.42

COACH

98.76

16.67

1

23.42

S-SITE

98.76

33.33

99.56

27.04

TargetSeq

98.33

0

1

0

COFACTOR

98.33

0

1

0

TM-SITE

98.33

0

1

0

FE

3

TargetCom

98.48

16.67

1

23.39

COACH

98.48

16.67

1

23.39

S-SITE

98.73

25.00

1

28.76

TargetSeq

98.26

12.5

99.9

20.03

COFACTOR

97.98

0

1

0

TM-SITE

97.98

0

1

0

ZN

30

TargetCom

98.38

40.63

99.42

37.49

COACH

97.65

40.91

98.66

31.86

S-SITE

97.43

43.32

98.37

33.51

TargetSeq

97.97

7.02

99.68

11.43

COFACTOR

98.14

0

1

0

TM-SITE

97.99

0

99.85

−0.15

SO4

5

TargetCom

97.11

6.67

99.61

7.61

COACH

97.02

6.67

99.51

7.08

S-SITE

97.11

0

1

0

TargetSeq

97.11

0

1

0

COFACTOR

97.39

6.67

99.9

1

TM-SITE

97.02

6.67

99.51

7.08

PO4

8

TargetCom

97.68

4.17

99.59

4.52

COACH

97.54

05

99.43

2.9

S-SITE

97.81

0

99.76

−0.36

TargetSeq

98.08

13.39

99.66

12.98

COFACTOR

97.91

0

99.86

−0.17

TM-SITE

98.05

0

1

0

ATP

4

TargetCom

93.92

5

97.14

1.38

COACH

93.92

5

97.14

1.38

S-SITE

96.42

0

1

0

TargetSeq

97.32

27.08

99.85

33.79

COFACTOR

96.42

0

1

0

TM-SITE

93.69

5

96.9

1.19

HEME

9

TargetCom

92.74

16.7

99.21

25.02

COACH

91.8

03.98

99.3

07.3

S-SITE

92.43

14.9

99.2

17.25

TargetSeq

89.54

15.47

95.68

11.59

COFACTOR

92.12

0

1

0

TM-SITE

92.12

0

1

0

  1. aThe number of “hard” target proteins in each type of ligand
  2. bThe numbers shown in bold are the best values of the non-combination based method