Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Bioinformatics

Fig. 3

From: acdc – Automated Contamination Detection and Confidence estimation for single-cell genome data

Fig. 3

Illustration of the complementary detection capabilities of DIP and CC using two different contaminated samples. Left: Using a mutual 9-nearest-neighbor graph, CC identifies two clusters (very small contamination) while DIP isn’t able to detect multimodality as seen in the distribution of pairwise distances below. Right: Two overlapping clusters prevent CC from detecting two components while DIP detects significant multimodality in the distribution of pairwise distances

Back to article page