Table 4 Precision, recall and F 1-scores of predicted clean base pairs for both ProDeGe and acdc on the simulated and benchmark data sets
From: acdc – Automated Contamination Detection and Confidence estimation for single-cell genome data
Data set | Precision | Recall | F 1 | Precision | Recall | F 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ProDeGe | ProDeGe | ProDeGe | acdc | acdc | acdc | |
simulated (kingdom) | No result | No result | No result | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
simulated (phylum) | No result | No result | No result | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 |
simulated (class) | No result | No result | No result | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
simulated (order) | No result | No result | No result | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 |
simulated (family) | No result | No result | No result | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
simulated (genus) | 0.22 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.96 |
simulated (species) | 0.50 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.77 | 0.46 |
benchmark (E.coli) | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.98 |
benchmark (M.ruber) | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
benchmark (P.heparinus) | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |