Skip to main content

Table 3 Performances of different models evaluated by 20 runs of 3-CV

From: Predicting potential drug-drug interactions by integrating chemical, biological, phenotypic and network data

Method

Similarity

Index

AUC

AUPR

Recall

Precision

Accuracy

F

Neighbor recommender

Method

Substructure

1

0.935

0.808

0.772

0.669

0.927

0.717

Target

2

0.806

0.425

0.420

0.579

0.831

0.486

Transporter

3

0.714

0.405

0.344

0.495

0.800

0.406

Enzyme

4

0.753

0.437

0.466

0.424

0.853

0.443

Pathway

5

0.810

0.624

0.674

0.510

0.898

0.581

Indication

6

0.903

0.640

0.584

0.658

0.888

0.618

Label

7

0.935

0.803

0.758

0.673

0.925

0.713

Off label

8

0.939

0.815

0.771

0.684

0.928

0.725

CN

9

0.940

0.816

0.761

0.691

0.927

0.724

AA

10

0.941

0.816

0.761

0.690

0.927

0.724

RA

11

0.942

0.819

0.763

0.691

0.928

0.725

Katz

12

0.933

0.782

0.715

0.666

0.917

0.689

ACT

13

0.866

0.721

0.629

0.574

0.915

0.600

RWR

14

0.940

0.814

0.760

0.688

0.927

0.722

Random walk

Method

Substructure

15

0.935

0.807

0.768

0.670

0.927

0.716

Target

16

0.844

0.608

0.601

0.555

0.888

0.576

Transporter

17

0.713

0.437

0.339

0.504

0.795

0.404

Enzyme

18

0.760

0.533

0.655

0.374

0.886

0.476

Pathway

19

0.810

0.648

0.724

0.515

0.906

0.601

Indication

20

0.939

0.820

0.773

0.693

0.930

0.731

Label

21

0.936

0.809

0.771

0.674

0.927

0.719

Off label

22

0.937

0.811

0.771

0.680

0.928

0.722

CN

23

0.937

0.807

0.748

0.685

0.925

0.715

AA

24

0.937

0.806

0.747

0.683

0.924

0.714

RA

25

0.936

0.799

0.741

0.675

0.923

0.706

Katz

26

0.936

0.801

0.743

0.677

0.923

0.708

ACT

27

0.866

0.706

0.658

0.699

0.834

0.643

RWR

28

0.938

0.813

0.759

0.690

0.927

0.723

Matrix perturbation method

 

29

0.941

0.813

0.755

0.709

0.928

0.731