Skip to main content

Table 5 Performances of the ensemble method and benchmark methods evaluated by 20 runs of 3-CV and 5-CV

From: Predicting potential drug-drug interactions by integrating chemical, biological, phenotypic and network data

Evluation

Method

AUC

AUPR

Precision

Recall

Accuracy

F-measure

3-CV evaluation

Vilar’s substructure-based model

0.670

0.273

0.145

0.535

0.684

0.229

Vilar’s CN index-based model

0.872

0.413

0.377

0.553

0.880

0.447

Substructure-based label propagation model

0.935

0.807

0.768

0.670

0.927

0.716

Side effect-based Label propagation model

0.936

0.809

0.771

0.674

0.927

0.719

Off side effect-based label propagation model

0.937

0.811

0.771

0.680

0.928

0.722

Weighted average ensemble method

0.947

0.832

0.782

0.703

0.932

0.740

Classifier ensemble method (L1)

0.954

0.841

0.788

0.717

0.934

0.751

Classifier ensemble method (L2)

0.952

0.839

0.784

0.712

0.933

0.746

5-CV evaluation

Vilar’s substructure-based model

0.670

0.273

0.145

0.535

0.684

0.229

Vilar’s CN index-based model

0.872

0.413

0.377

0.553

0.880

0.447

Substructure-based label propagation model

0.936

0.758

0.763

0.616

0.950

0.681

Side effect-based Label propagation model

0.936

0.760

0.764

0.621

0.950

0.685

Off side effect-based label propagation model

0.937

0.763

0.761

0.627

0.950

0.688

Weighted average ensemble method

0.951

0.795

0.775

0.659

0.953

0.712

Classifier ensemble method (L1)

0.957

0.807

0.785

0.670

0.955

0.723

Classifier ensemble method (L2)

0.956

0.806

0.783

0.665

0.955

0.719