Skip to main content

Table 1 Compendious result table. The instability of SNORA11 is confirmed and the effect size is high, which indicates a false positive result. The plotted SNORA11 profile in Fig. 4 confirms this suspicion. The effect size of the peak score covers up to 26% of the detection range

From: TTCA: an R package for the identification of differentially expressed genes in time course microarray data

Consensus rank

Gene name

Consensus score

Consensus score p-value

PubMed

Instability score

Effect size of peak score

1

CTGF

1.00

3.57E-05

73

0.009

0.26

2

EGR1

0.91

7.25E-05

101

0.006

0.23

3

SNORA11

0.62

8.18E-04

0

0.038

0.26

4

PTGS2

0.59

0.001

804

0.009

0.10

5

JUN

0.58

0.001

6789

0.005

0.11

6

GLIPR1

0.57

0.001

0

0.006

0.13

7

FOS

0.55

0.002

920

0.002

0.14

8

AREG

0.53

0.002

549

0.006

0.10

13

MIR4320

0.44

0.005

0

0.016

0.15

15

F3

0.44

0.006

65

0.011

0.10

19

IL8

0.41

0.007

43

0.018

0.13

20

EGR2

0.41

0.008

7

0.005

0.12

21

PCNA

0.40

0.009

583

0.003

0.03

29

DUSP5

0.37

0.013

4

0.012

0.10

36

MYC

0.34

0.017

984

0.002

0.06

37

ROS1

0.34

0.017

84

0.005

0.03

38

HIF1A

0.34

0.017

185

0.007

0.08

42

MIR554

0.34

0.018

0

0.004

0.15

45

IL24

0.32

0.022

0

0.003

0.06

49

TGFB2

0.31

0.025

121

0.008

0.04

51

TGFB1

0.30

0.027

887

0.004

0.03

52

JUNB

0.30

0.028

54

0.008

0.05