Skip to main content

Table 2 Mechanical Turk post hoc analysis

From: Unboxing cluster heatmaps

  Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17  
Technique Pairs est err t p   est err t p   est err t p   est err t p   est err t p  
Cluster Heatmap, Gapmap 1.056 0.542 1.949 0.361   –0.274 0.503 –0.546 0.994   –0.186 0.497 –0.374 0.999   0.916 0.531 1.726 0.511   3.121 0.945 3.303 0.014 ∗
Cluster Heatmap, Circle Packing –0.065 0.504 –0.128 1.000   0.657 0.525 1.252 0.808   0.658 0.512 1.286 0.792   0.405 0.601 0.675 0.984   –3.745 0.960 –3.901 0.002 ∗∗
Cluster Heatmap, Sunburst 2.708 0.811 3.338 0.010 ∗ –1.191 0.571 –2.086 0.290   –1.159 0.537 –2.160 0.256   –0.292 0.579 –0.504 0.996   0.205 0.952 0.215 1.000  
Cluster Heatmap, Radial Dendrogram 2.269 0.702 3.232 0.015 ∗ –2.032 0.698 –2.912 0.041 ∗ –1.159 0.537 –2.160 0.256   –0.965 0.662 –1.457 0.688   3.003 0.960 3.128 0.025 ∗
Cluster Heatmap, Force Directed Tree 1.504 0.573 2.623 0.087 · –0.903 0.533 –1.694 0.530   –1.041 0.524 –1.989 0.348   0.550 0.529 1.040 0.903   3.455 0.938 3.683 0.004 ∗∗
Gapmap, Circle Packing 0.992 0.546 1.817 0.443   0.383 0.538 0.711 0.980   0.473 0.516 0.916 0.942   1.322 0.581 2.275 0.202   –0.624 0.960 –0.650 0.987  
Gapmap, Sunburst 1.652 0.838 1.972 0.347   –0.916 0.583 –1.571 0.612   –0.973 0.541 –1.801 0.464   –1.208 0.559 –2.163 0.252   –2.917 0.952 –3.063 0.030 ∗
Gapmap, Radial Dendrogram 1.213 0.732 1.656 0.550   –1.758 0.708 –2.483 0.126   –0.973 0.541 –1.801 0.464   –1.881 0.644 –2.921 0.040 ∗ –0.118 0.960 –0.123 1.000  
Gapmap, Force Directed Tree –0.448 0.610 –0.734 0.977   0.629 0.546 1.151 0.857   0.856 0.528 1.622 0.583   0.366 0.506 0.724 0.979   –0.333 0.938 –0.355 0.999  
Circle Packing, Sunburst 2.644 0.814 3.248 0.014 ∗ –0.533 0.603 –0.885 0.949   –0.501 0.555 –0.903 0.946   0.113 0.625 0.181 1.000   –3.540 0.967 –3.660 0.004 ∗∗
Circle Packing, Radial Dendrogram 2.204 0.705 3.127 0.021 ∗ –1.375 0.724 –1.899 0.397   –0.501 0.555 –0.903 0.946   –0.560 0.703 –0.796 0.968   –0.742 0.975 –0.761 0.974  
Circle Packing, Force Directed Tree 1.440 0.577 2.495 0.119   –0.246 0.567 –0.433 0.998   –0.383 0.542 –0.707 0.981   0.956 0.579 1.650 0.561   –0.290 0.953 –0.305 1.000  
Sunburst, Radial Dendrogram 0.439 0.949 0.463 0.997   0.842 0.758 1.110 0.875   0.000 0.577 0.000 1.000   0.673 0.685 0.983 0.922   –2.798 0.967 –2.893 0.048 ∗
Sunburst, Force Directed Tree 1.204 0.859 1.402 0.716   –0.288 0.610 –0.472 0.997   –0.118 0.565 –0.208 1.000   –0.842 0.557 –1.513 0.653   –3.250 0.945 –3.438 0.009 ∗∗
Force Directed Tree, Radial Dendrogram 0.765 0.756 1.011 0.910   –1.129 0.730 –1.547 0.628   –0.118 0.565 –0.208 1.000   –1.515 0.642 –2.359 0.169   –0.452 0.953 –0.474 0.997  
  1. Shows the significance results (estimate, standard error, t-value, and p-value) from running a post-hoc analysis using Tukey’s HSD test on clustering-related questions. There are several statistically significant differences in means for questions 13 and 17. The differences between the best and worst performers in questions 14 and 16 are also significant
  2. Legend: *** p≤ 0.001, ** p≤ 0.01, * p≤ 0.05, . p≤ 0.1
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us