Skip to main content

Table 1 Results from the tests that compare Orthograph performance to HaMStR [3]

From: Orthograph: a versatile tool for mapping coding nucleotide sequences to clusters of orthologous genes

Software

Test

Genes

Species

OGS

Found

TP

FP

FN

Sens.

Acc.

Orthograph

Single-copy

4625

A. mellifera

15,314

4582

4577

5

48

0.990

0.996

Orthograph

Single-copy

4625

H. saltator

18,564

4590

4587

3

38

0.992

0.997

HaMStR

Single-copy

4625

A. mellifera

15,314

4589

4588

3

39

0.992

0.997

HaMStR

Single-copy

4625

H. saltator

18,564

4573

4571

2

54

0.988

0.996

Orthograph

Isoforms

8

C. floridanus

17,064

7

7

0

1

0.875

0.999

HaMStR

Isoforms

8

C. floridanus

17,064

7

7

0

1

0.875

0.999

Orthograph

Inparalogs

647

A. cephalotes

18,093

583

583

0

6

0.901

0.996

  1. Sensitivity is defined as the ratio of true positives (TP) to TP plus false negatives (FN). Accuracy is defined as the ratio of TP plus true negatives (TN) to the total number of genes in the official gene set (OGS). FP, false positives. Note that the results are meant to demonstrate equality in performance despite algorithmic differences