Skip to main content

Table 2 This table shows the main results comparing the feature selection benchmarks of our approach with Lasso and 1-SVM on the spiked data-set. Given results correspond to the average results over 10 repetitions of the classifier with 6 non-zero values

From: Sparse Proteomics Analysis – a compressed sensing-based approach for feature selection and classification of high-dimensional proteomics mass spectrometry data

 

SPA

Lasso

1-SVM

Concentration

TP [a]

Sens [b]

Specs [c]

B. Acc [d]

TP

Sens

Spec

B. Acc

TP

Sens

Spec

B. Acc

0.075pMol/L

2

0.333

1.000

0.667

1

0.167

1.000

0.583

1

0.167

1.000

0.583

3.03pMol/L

4

0.667

1.000

0.833

2

0.333

1.000

0.667

1

0.167

1.000

0.583

0.30nMol/L

2

0.333

1.000

0.667

1

0.167

1.000

0.583

1

0.167

1.000

0.583

0.76nMol/L

2

0.333

1.000

0.667

2

0.333

1.000

0.667

2

0.333

1.000

0.667

121.21nMol/L

3

0.500

1.000

0.750

2

0.333

1.000

0.667

2

0.333

1.000

0.667

  1. [a]TP: Number of spiked peaks that are correctly detected
  2. [b]Sens: Sensitivity in detecting spiked peaks (T P/(T P+F N))
  3. [c]Spec: Specificity in detecting spiked peaks (T N/(F P+T N))
  4. [d]B. Acc: Balanced Accuracy (\( \frac {\text {sens.} + \text {spec.}}{2}\))