Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of ATria’s results with those other algorithms on a 102-node synthetic network with five cliques, three with leaders A, B, C, two with villains D, E and bridge nodes F-O connecting cliques

From: ATria: a novel centrality algorithm applied to biological networks

Node Betweenness Closeness Degree PageTrust PN ATria
A (Leader)    2   2 2
B (Leader) 9   1   1 1
C (Leader) 1 3   4   5
D (Villain) 3   3 88 102 4
E (Villain) 2 1   102 101 3
F (Bridge)    101 98 98 6
G (Bridge)    96 95 94 10
H (Bridge)    100 101 97 13
I (Bridge)    95 94 93 9
J (Bridge) 15   98 91 96 15
K (Bridge) 8   97 99 97 11
L (Bridge)    99 97 96 12
M (Bridge) 5   93 96 91 7
N (Bridge)   99 102 100 99 14
O (Bridge) 13 8 94 93 100 8
  1. Final rankings of any nodes A-O found in the top or bottom 15