Skip to main content

Table 4 Performance of predicting noisy annotations in GOA files of H. sapiens (archived date: May, 2016)

From: NoGOA: predicting noisy GO annotations using evidences and sparse representation

   Random LF NtN NoisyGOA SR EC NtN+EC NoisyGOA+EC NoGOA
BP Precision 23.99±0.49 29.50±0.57 23.71±0.47 33.98±0.67 35.24±0.56 29.43±0.56 26.30±0.51 38.55±0.72 4 1 . 1 4±0.76
  Recall 5 7 . 7 5±1.00 29.58±0.57 55.84±0.87 41.08±0.76 35.67±1.48 49.04±0.86 52.52±0.89 44.82±0.81 41.45±0.76
  F1-Score 31.51±0.60 29.54±0.57 30.94±0.55 36.63±0.70 35.44±0.69 35.04±0.64 33.24±0.61 4 0 . 9 3±0.75 4 1 . 2 8±0.76
CC Precision 19.34±0.52 28.62±0.77 17.75±0.52 36.41±0.89 4 1 . 4 1±1.01 17.40±0.45 18.00±0.48 36.13±0.88 4 1 . 3 4±0.97
  Recall 50.62±1.12 28.69±0.77 49.68±1.18 44.45±1.02 41.91±1.02 7 9 . 2 2±1.40 44.80±1.07 44.15±1.02 41.85±0.98
  F1-Score 25.98±0.65 28.65±0.77 24.22±0.65 38.79±0.93 4 1 . 6 3±1.02 25.34±0.58 24.34±0.61 38.50±0.92 4 1 . 5 6±0.97
MF Precision 27.74±0.39 23.60±0.38 36.43±0.45 38.16±0.48 46.18±0.54 41.25±0.50 49.90±0.55 52.18±0.57 5 8 . 9 2±0.60
  Recall 41.94±0.50 23.63±0.38 48.83±0.57 46.41±0.55 46.57±0.54 6 0 . 4 6±0.64 56.80±0.60 58.26±0.62 59.47±0.60
  F1-Score 30.35±0.41 23.61±0.38 38.82±0.47 39.44±0.48 46.34±0.54 44.45±0.51 51.75±0.56 53.23±0.58 5 9 . 1 4±0.60
  1. The numbers in boldface denote the best performance
\