Skip to main content

Table 4 Performance of predicting noisy annotations in GOA files of H. sapiens (archived date: May, 2016)

From: NoGOA: predicting noisy GO annotations using evidences and sparse representation

  

Random

LF

NtN

NoisyGOA

SR

EC

NtN+EC

NoisyGOA+EC

NoGOA

BP

Precision

23.99±0.49

29.50±0.57

23.71±0.47

33.98±0.67

35.24±0.56

29.43±0.56

26.30±0.51

38.55±0.72

4 1 . 1 4±0.76

 

Recall

5 7 . 7 5±1.00

29.58±0.57

55.84±0.87

41.08±0.76

35.67±1.48

49.04±0.86

52.52±0.89

44.82±0.81

41.45±0.76

 

F1-Score

31.51±0.60

29.54±0.57

30.94±0.55

36.63±0.70

35.44±0.69

35.04±0.64

33.24±0.61

4 0 . 9 3±0.75

4 1 . 2 8±0.76

CC

Precision

19.34±0.52

28.62±0.77

17.75±0.52

36.41±0.89

4 1 . 4 1±1.01

17.40±0.45

18.00±0.48

36.13±0.88

4 1 . 3 4±0.97

 

Recall

50.62±1.12

28.69±0.77

49.68±1.18

44.45±1.02

41.91±1.02

7 9 . 2 2±1.40

44.80±1.07

44.15±1.02

41.85±0.98

 

F1-Score

25.98±0.65

28.65±0.77

24.22±0.65

38.79±0.93

4 1 . 6 3±1.02

25.34±0.58

24.34±0.61

38.50±0.92

4 1 . 5 6±0.97

MF

Precision

27.74±0.39

23.60±0.38

36.43±0.45

38.16±0.48

46.18±0.54

41.25±0.50

49.90±0.55

52.18±0.57

5 8 . 9 2±0.60

 

Recall

41.94±0.50

23.63±0.38

48.83±0.57

46.41±0.55

46.57±0.54

6 0 . 4 6±0.64

56.80±0.60

58.26±0.62

59.47±0.60

 

F1-Score

30.35±0.41

23.61±0.38

38.82±0.47

39.44±0.48

46.34±0.54

44.45±0.51

51.75±0.56

53.23±0.58

5 9 . 1 4±0.60

  1. The numbers in boldface denote the best performance