Skip to main content

Table 4 Performance comparison of disease normalization models using various parameters

From: A method for named entity normalization in biomedical articles: application to diseases and plants

 

Development set

Test set

Parameters

Win

Dim

Method

Precision

Recall

F-score

Precision

Recall

F-score

5_200_CBOW

5

200

CBOW

0.740

0.918

0.819

0.684

0.896

0.776

5_200_skip

5

200

Skip-gram

0.730

0.909

0.809

0.719

0.890

0.795

5_300_CBOW

5

300

CBOW

0.738

0.918

0.818

0.674

0.892

0.767

5_300_skip

5

300

Skip-gram

0.746

0.916

0.822

0.722

0.893

0.798

5_400_CBOW

5

400

CBOW

0.730

0.918

0.813

0.661

0.878

0.754

5_400_skip

5

400

Skip-gram

0.732

0.916

0.813

0.730

0.905

0.808

7_200_CBOW

7

200

CBOW

0.738

0.919

0.819

0.676

0.891

0.769

7_200_skip

7

200

Skip-gram

0.719

0.900

0.799

0.698

0.882

0.780

7_300_CBOW

7

300

CBOW

0.709

0.911

0.798

0.662

0.880

0.756

7_300_skip

7

300

Skip-gram

0.683

0.895

0.775

0.776

0.769

0.772

7_400_CBOW

7

400

CBOW

0.702

0.898

0.788

0.632

0.850

0.725

7_400_skip

7

400

Skip-gram

0.690

0.896

0.779

0.667

0.887

0.761

8_200_CBOW

8

200

CBOW

0.710

0.907

0.797

0.706

0.891

0.788

  1. The bold font denotes the best result for each column