Skip to main content

Table 2 Correction power/sensitivity (in terms of total corrected bases and corrected read length) and accuracy (in terms of identity and indel rate) of seven methods over M. abscessus dataset (5 Mb genome, 251 bp read length)

From: An efficient error correction algorithm using FM-index

  Corrected bases (bp) Corrected length (bp) Identity (%) Indel rate (10−5)
Raw data 353.43 Mbp 180.77 98.80% 4.37
Coral 358.65 Mbp 182.72 99.19% 4.59
Karect 387.17 Mbp 196.62 99.42% 2.91
FMOE 492.95 Mbp 249.31 99.85% 1.37
QuorUm 361.02 Mbp 182.55 99.96% 0.56
RACER 381.11 Mbp 192.49 99.89% 1.23
BLESS2 358.02 Mbp 182.35 99.87% 0.68
SGA 366.05 Mbp 182.16 99.46% 2.35
  1. Coral, Karect, and our FMOE are overlap-based correction methods whereas QuorUm, RACER, BLESS2, and SGA belong to k-mer spectrum approach