Skip to main content

Table 6 Dataset D: classification performance of Ph-CNN compared to other classifiers on Healthy vs. iCDf classification task

From: Phylogenetic convolutional neural networks in metagenomics

iCDf

Ph-CNN

LSVM

p

MCC

min CI

max CI

MCC

min CI

max CI

62

0.781

0.772

0.790

0.804

0.799

0.808

124

0.863

0.854

0.871

0.861

0.858

0.865

186

0.922

0.918

0.926

0.921

0.919

0.924

247

0.944

0.941

0.947

0.941

0.939

0.942

 

MLPNN

RF

p

MCC

min CI

max CI

MCC

min CI

max CI

62

0.845

0.840

0.849

0.748

0.743

0.753

124

0.889

0.886

0.893

0.808

0.803

0.814

186

0.879

0.875

0.883

0.880

0.877

0.883

247

0.901

0.899

0.904

0.890

0.887

0.893

  1. The performance measure is MCC, with 95% studentized bootstrap confidence intervals (min CI, max CI). Models are computed for p={25%,50%,75% and 100%} of total number of features for each task. Comparing algorithms are linear Support Vector Machines (LSVM), Random Forest (RF) and MultiLayer Perceptron (MLPNN)