Table 2 FDR comparison between GENSENG and R-GENSENG
Window | Methods comparison ((G:GENSENG,R:R-GENSENG)) | Â | Â | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Total CNV | Deletion | Duplication | |||
Size | G | R | G | R | G | R |
100bps | 18/206 | 28/215 | 10/122 | 16/128 | 8/84 | 12/87 |
| Â | 8.7% | 13.0% | 8.2% | 12.5% | 9.5% | 13.8% |
200bps | 10/197 | 14/197 | 3/114 | 5/116 | 7/83 | 9/81 |
| Â | 5.1% | 7.1% | 2.6% | 4.3% | 8.4% | 11.1% |
500bps | 5/174 | 7/175 | 0/99 | 0/99 | 5/75 | 7/76 |
| Â | 2.9% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 6.7% | 9.2% |
1000bps | 0/125 | 4/125 | 0/78 | 0/75 | 0/47 | 4/50 |
| Â | 0% | 3.2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8% |