Table 7 Performance comparison of DeepCNF and PSIPRED in the BetaSheet916 and BetaSheet1452 sets
From: Identification of residue pairing in interacting β-strands from a predicted residue contact map
Test Set | Method | Secondary structure category | Precision | Recall | F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BetaSheet916 | PSIPRED | H | 90.3% | 85.9% | 88.1% |
E | 86.8% | 78.9% | 82.6% | ||
C | 79.3% | 86.8% | 82.9% | ||
DeepCNF | H | 92.6% | 78.8% | 85.2% | |
E | 86.4% | 76.9% | 81.4% | ||
C | 75.1% | 88.9% | 81.4% | ||
BetaSheet1452 | PSIPRED | H | 90.4% | 87.2% | 88.8% |
E | 87.3% | 79.1% | 83.0% | ||
C | 79.2% | 86.3% | 82.6% | ||
DeepCNF | H | 92.6% | 80.4% | 86.0% | |
E | 87.4% | 76.5% | 81.6% | ||
C | 74.5% | 88.9% | 81.0% |