Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison among classification performances of CNN, DBN and RDP algorithms at varying of k-mer size. for both SG and AMP datasets

From: Deep learning models for bacteria taxonomic classification of metagenomic data

Evaluation of short-reads classification at genus level

 

Dataset

Algorithm

k

Accuracy

Precision

Recall

F1

   

mean %

std

mean %

std

mean %

std

mean %

std

AMP

CNN

3

51.01

0.005

51.40

0.005

50.90

0.005

50.84

0.015

  

4

77.69

0.004

77.91

0.005

77.69

0.005

77.57

0.014

  

5

88.13

0.005

88.38

0.005

88.07

0.006

88.98

0.014

  

6

90.92

0.005

91.14

0.005

90.91

0.005

90.82

0.009

  

7

91.33

0.004

91.57

0.004

91.32

0.004

91.18

0.015

 

DBN

3

56.69

0.013

57.88

0.011

56.62

0.013

55.56

0.013

  

4

85.10

0.004

85.47

0.005

85.08

0.004

84.53

0.008

  

5

89.82

0.003

90.12

0.004

89.82

0.003

89.63

0.004

  

6

90.55

0.005

90.73

0.005

90.53

0.005

90.45

0.005

  

7

91.37

0.005

91.62

0.005

91.37

0.005

91.26

0.005

 

RDP

-

83.84

0.007

84.42

0.007

83.57

0.007

83.65

0.007

SG

CNN

3

17.02

0.018

17.32

0.013

16.53

0.015

16.69

0.006

  

4

32.98

0.015

33.42

0.012

32.59

0.013

32.65

0.005

  

5

59.80

0.015

60.34

0.014

59.41

0.015

59.31

0.005

  

6

80.77

0.009

81.10

0.010

80.41

0.009

80.33

0.005

  

7

85.50

0.014

85.70

0.014

85.20

0.014

85.11

0.005

 

DBN

3

17.75

0.009

19.80

0.010

17.50

0.009

16.32

0.010

  

4

54.11

0.007

55.62

0.007

53.67

0.007

53.17

0.007

  

5

71.44

0.007

72.45

0.009

71.07

0.007

70.99

0.008

  

6

77.85

0.007

78.36

0.008

77.53

0.008

77.47

0.008

  

7

81.27

0.002

81.87

0.004

80.92

0.003

80.94

0.002

 

RDP

-

80.38

0.009

80.83

0.008

80.18

0.008

80.09

0.009