Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluation of dnaasm in comparison to ABySS, Velvet and SPAdes assembler

From: De novo assembly of bacterial genomes with repetitive DNA regions by dnaasm application

Sample

Assembler

Type

No. of

N50 [bp]

Max [bp]

Avg.

Avg.

  

of output

contigs

  

mis.

indels

ERR351243

ABySS

unitigs

79

40021

224368

0.00

1.61

 

Velvet

unitigs

206

12813

38818

0.31

0.81

 

SPAdes

unitigs

43

61281

287932

0.93

2.28

 

dnaasm

unitigs

84

30628

191880

0.06

1.98

 

ABySS

scaffolds

33

65136

224368

1.59

2.69

 

Velvet

scaffolds

30

82451

224509

1.42

3.15

 

SPAdes

scaffolds

27

74784

333212

1.23

2.53

 

dnaasm

scaffolds

34

61265

333846

0.62

3.82

SRR1981622

ABySS

unitigs

81

36448

110990

1.11

0.99

 

Velvet

unitigs

254

8636

27708

1.12

0.37

 

SPAdes

unitigs

53

58976

228504

1.42

1.29

 

dnaasm

unitigs

73

45793

134195

0.93

1.11

 

ABySS

scaffolds

40

67391

207675

4.89

1.96

 

Velvet

scaffolds

33

114376

285632

4.99

2.65

 

SPAdes

scaffolds

35

98439

228504

3.26

2.09

 

dnaasm

scaffolds

39

91627

228504

3.33

1.73

SRR1981619

ABySS

unitigs

80

36449

110993

8.36

2.85

 

Velvet

unitigs

314

7163

22826

7.92

1.56

 

SPAdes

unitigs

53

58765

228586

9.00

3.21

 

dnaasm

unitigs

77

43959

134261

7.76

2.77

 

ABySS

scaffolds

43

79578

111309

16.00

4.15

 

Velvet

scaffolds

35

107026

492812

10.06

4.32

 

SPAdes

scaffolds

34

98351

228586

8.99

4.31

 

dnaasm

scaffolds

38

93136

256270

11.21

4.25

SRR5431732

ABySS

unitigs

559

11471

57586

17.85

2.90

 

Velvet

unitigs

1032

4790

18304

17.98

2.57

 

SPAdes

unitigs

238

30607

129385

21.02

3.74

 

dnaasm

unitigs

416

16178

59383

21.68

4.10

 

ABySS

scaffolds

208

35552

131767

19.81

4.51

 

Velvet

scaffolds

202

41843

182297

21.99

7.21

 

SPAdes

scaffolds

172

46834

159097

22.65

4.72

 

dnaasm

scaffolds

354

19644

120052

25.13

4.42

  1. Unitigs output depicts assembling mode without using paired-end tags, scaffolds - with paired reads. The table shows that the presented de novo assembler works comparatively in terms of the number of contigs, N50 statistic, the largest contig length and the quality (average number of mismatches and indels per 100000 aligned bases) of the resultant DNA sequences