Table 3 Overall Performance of The Denoising Methods Using the Real WES Data
From: Noise cancellation using total variation for copy number variation detection
Denoising Methods | Amplified CNVs | Deleted CNVs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity | FDR | Specificity | Sensitivity | FDR | Specificity | |
Before applying denoising method | 50.99% | 42.06% | 80.45% | 60.37% | 64.32% | 56.71% |
After applying DWT | 68.81% | 41.65% | 79.92% | 77.65% | 54.32% | 72.23% |
After applying Taut String | 69.52% | 40.21% | 84.51% | 79.93% | 50.72% | 77.25% |