Table 11 Experimental results obtained by using RF to filter the candidate complexes which are predicted from the modified DIP network by filtering edges with simi-thres 0.66 first and then adding edges with different simi-thres

fixing filtering sime-thres to 0.66

 0.66_0.35

665

0.8797

0.4428

0.5891

+0.0369

 0.66_0.36

659

0.8786

0.4398

0.5862

+0.0340

 0.66_0.37

667

0.8741

0.4398

0.5852

+0.0330

 0.66_0.38

660

0.8758

0.4443

0.5895

+0.0373

 0.66_0.39

673

0.8678

0.4413

0.5851

+0.0329

 0.66_0.40

669

0.8789

0.4443

0.5902

+0.0380

 0.66_0.41

669

0.8714

0.4428

0.5872

+0.0350

 0.66_0.42

667

0.8786

0.4428

0.5888

+0.0366

 0.66_0.43

672

0.8705

0.4398

0.5844

+0.0322

 0.66_0.44

667

0.8741

0.4413

0.5865

+0.0343

 0.66_0.45

667

0.8771

0.4398

0.5859

+0.0337

fixing adding sime-thres to 0.38

 0.65_0.38

594

0.8064

0.4086

0.5424

-0.0098

 0.66_0.38

660

0.8758

0.4443

0.5895

+0.0373

 0.67_0.38

707

0.7765

0.4250

0.5493

-0.0029

 0.68_0.38

681

0.7797

0.4190

0.5451

-0.0071

 0.69_0.38

687

0.7729

0.4160

0.5409

-0.0113

 0.70_0.38

676

0.7678

0.4086

0.5334

-0.0188

 0.71_0.38

664

0.7636

0.4071

0.5311

-0.0211

 0.72_0.38

678

0.7478

0.4071

0.5272

-0.0250

 0.73_0.38

677

0.7518

0.4042

0.5257

-0.0265

 0.74_0.38

678

0.7552

0.4012

0.5240

-0.0282

 0.75_0.38

655

0.7588

0.3923

0.5172

-0.0350