Table 5 Simulated high coverage datasets analysis where the inputs of EIM pipeline are the read set and genome reconstructed by Bowtie2
From: Assessing the impact of exact reads on reducing the error rate of read mapping
Assembly | Exact | EIM (v2) | Bowtie2 |
|---|---|---|---|
ReadSet1 | Â | Â | Â |
Contigs-500 | 68 | 2 | 6 |
N50 (kbp) | 156.4 | 3543.3 | 2385.6 |
Errors | 0 | 29 | 38 |
IUPAC-codes | 0 | 11 | 137 |
Genome-Fraction (%) | 99.381 | 99.999 | 100 |
ReadSet2 | Â | Â | Â |
Contigs-500 | 142 | 3 | 5 |
N50 (kbp) | 62.7 | 1371.6 | 939.1 |
Errors | 0 | 45 | 92 |
IUPAC-codes | 0 | 29 | 246 |
Genome-Fraction (%) | 99.338 | 100 | 99.997 |
ReadSet3 | Â | Â | Â |
Contigs-500 | 96 | 6 | 3 |
N50 (kbp) | 94.4 | 1096.2 | 3267.7 |
Errors | 2 | 54 | 87 |
IUPAC-codes | 0 | 11 | 140 |
Genome-Fraction (%) | 99.285 | 99.997 | 100 |
ReadSet4 | Â | Â | Â |
Contigs-500 | 77 | 3 | 3 |
N50 (kbp) | 115.5 | 2337.4 | 1530.2 |
Errors | 6 | 55 | 72 |
IUPAC-codes | 0 | 15 | 34 |
Genome-Fraction (%) | 99.436 | 99.998 | 100 |