Skip to main content

Table 2 The performance of best docking pose generated by different docking methods using blind docking on the PPDbench dataset

From: Benchmarking of different molecular docking methods for protein-peptide docking

Docking methods

FNAT

L-RMSD

I-RMSD

% Success

ATTRACT-20a

66.51

6.16

6.12

54.13

ATTRACT-10

57.44

8.86

8.75

48.87

ATTRACT-5

53.01

10.38

10.23

42.10

ATTRACT-3

48.95

11.74

11.53

39.09

ATTRACT-1

40.86

15.59

15.30

34.58

Hex-20

30.92

25.73

25.64

18.04

Hex-10

26.62

27.85

27.82

17.29

Hex-5

21.33

30.37

30.31

15.03

Hex-3

17.88

31.77

31.70

12.78

Hex-1

13.06

35.64

35.55

10.52

ZDOCK-20

69.67

7.53

7.40

63.90

ZDOCK-10

61.79

9.42

9.27

53.38

ZDOCK-5

57.16

10.87

10.78

48.87

ZDOCK-3

54.14

11.97

11.84

42.85

ZDOCK-1

42.88

15.85

15.74

32.33

PatchDock-20

55.99

7.98

7.79

26.31

PatchDock-10

48.01

9.93

9.78

21.05

PatchDock-5

39.78

12.45

12.30

18.79

PatchDock-3

34.55

14.61

14.39

17.29

PatchDock-1

21.83

19.97

19.71

11.27

pepATTRACT-20

27.25

13.76

13.57

1.50

pepATTRACT-10

22.70

16.04

15.84

1.50

pepATTRACT-5

18.67

18.24

18.07

1.50

pepATTRACT-3

16.22

19.55

19.31

0.75

pepATTRACT-1

12.32

22.12

21.88

0.00

FRODOCK-20

71.44

3.72

3.69

55.63

FRODOCK-10

70.79

4.06

3.94

55.63

FRODOCK-5

64.16

6.04

5.92

50.37

FRODOCK-3

62.92

6.79

6.69

50.37

FRODOCK-1

48.40

12.46

12.21

39.09

  1. aNumber indicate number of top docking poses generated by method