Skip to main content

Table 12 Results of our modal and of other state-of-the-art methods on S. cerevisiae

From: Predicting protein-protein interactions using high-quality non-interacting pairs

Method

Negative samples

ACC

PE

RE

SPE

MCC

F1

AUC

Our method

Sub

93.79% ± 0.43%

95.18% ± 0.41%

92.25% ± 0.78%

95.33% ± 0.45%

87.62% ± 0.83%

93.69% ± 0.38%

98.13% ± 0.17%

 

NIP-SS

94.34% ± 0.38%

95.62% ± 0.75%

92.96% ± 0.40%

95.74% ± 0.75%

88.73% ± 0.77%

94.27% ± 0.34%

98.24% ± 0.11%

 

NIP-RW

87.92% ± 0.24%

90.04% ± 1.69%

85.32% ± 1.90%

90.48% ± 2.20%

75.97% ± 0.55%

87.59% ± 0.35%

94.23% ± 0.12%

Du’s work [27]

Sub

92.58% ± 0.38%

94.21% ± 0.45%

90.95% ± 0.41%

94.41% ± 0.45%

85.41% ± 0.76%

92.55% ± 0.39%

97.55% ± 0.16%

 

NIP-SS

94.44% ± 0.35%

95.46% ± 0.38%

93.44% ± 0.45%

95.45% ± 0.41%

88.90% ± 0.68%

94.44% ± 0.37%

98.22% ± 0.20%

 

NIP-RW

88.59% ± 0.32%

92.61% ± 0.41%

84.14% ± 0.43%

93.13% ± 0.35%

77.52% ± 0.59%

88.17% ± 0.34%

94.73% ± 0.18%

You’s work [25]

Sub

89.15% ± 0.33%

90.00% ± 0.57%

88.10% ± 0.17%

90.21% ± 0.61%

78.33% ± 0.67%

89.04% ± 0.31%

94.78% ± 0.21%

 

NIP-SS

94.42% ± 0.47%

96.71% ± 0.47%

91.96% ± 0.64%

96.87% ± 0.46%

88.94% ± 0.92%

94.28% ± 0.49%

98.46% ± 0.12%

 

NIP-RW

86.03% ± 0.43%

89.19% ± 0.60%

82.00% ± 0.70%

90.06% ± 0.64%

72.30% ± 0.85%

85.44% ± 0.46%

93.33% ± 0.46%

Zhou’s work [23]

Sub

88.76% ± 0.37%

89.44% ± 0.27%

87.89% ± 0.45%

89.62% ± 0.30%

77.53% ± 0.53%

88.66% ± 0.28%

94.69% ± 0.31%

 

NIP-SS

92.10% ± 0.34%

93.48% ± 0.45%

90.51% ± 0.73%

93.68% ± 0.49%

84.24% ± 0.67%

91.97% ± 0.37%

97.29% ± 0.16%

 

NIP-RW

82.64% ± 0.33%

83.98% ± 0.34%

80.67% ± 0.48%

84.61% ± 0.36%

65.34% ± 0.65%

82.30% ± 0.35%

90.00% ± 0.39%

Yang’s work [22]

Sub

84.81% ± 0.37%

87.53% ± 0.14%

81.18% ± 0.84%

88.44% ± 0.18%

69.80% ± 0.71%

84.23% ± 0.47%

90.03% ± 0.31%

 

NIP-SS

89.18% ± 0.35%

93.34% ± 0.33%

84.38% ± 0.53%

93.98% ± 0.31%

78.73% ± 0.69%

88.64% ± 0.38%

95.50% ± 0.20%

 

NIP-RW

83.98% ± 0.48%

86.09% ± 0.67%

81.07% ± 0.80%

86.89% ± 0.76%

68.09% ± 0.97%

83.50% ± 0.51%

91.45% ± 0.27%

Guo’s work [21]

Sub

87.88% ± 0.56%

88.16% ± 0.90%

87.53% ± 0.59%

88.24% ± 1.02%

75.77% ± 1.12%

87.84% ± 0.53%

93.69% ± 0.33%

 

NIP-SS

90.00% ± 0.43%

90.45% ± 0.68%

89.45% ± 0.69%

90.55% ± 0.77%

80.01% ± 0.86%

89.94% ± 0.43%

95.02% ± 0.27%

 

NIP-RW

82.43% ± 0.27%

83.48% ± 0.40%

80.87% ± 0.45%

83.99% ± 0.49%

64.89% ± 0.54%

82.15% ± 0.27%

89.04% ± 0.33%