Table 1 A sample of known protein characteristics represented in a form similar to predicate logic’s premises and used as specification rules. The abbreviations in Table 3 are used in the formation of these premises. Ri denotes premise number i. The following Logic Symbols are used: “∧” for Conjunction; “∨” for Logical Disjunction; “→” for implies
From: Predicting protein functions by applying predicate logic to biomedical literature
R1: FD(Px) →(ST(Px) →F(Px)) | |
R2: AAS(Px) → ST(Px) | |
R3: AAS(Px) → F(Px) | |
R4: CBND(Px, Ly) ∨ AAS(Px)→ ST(Px) | |
R5: (FD(Px) ∨ ST(Px)) → F(Px) | |
R6: PPI(Px, Py) → PCF(Px, Py) | |
R7: PCF(Px, Py)→(F(Px) →F(Py)) | |
R8: PCF(Px, Py)→F(Px) ∨F(Py) | |
R9: (ST(Px) ∧ ST(Py)) → (F(Px) →F(Py)) | |
R10: (AAS(Px) ∧ AAS(Py)) → (ST(Px) →F(Py)) | |
R11: CBND(Px, Ly) ∧ F(Px) → AAS(Px) | |
R12: NCBND(Px ∧ Py) → PPI(Px, Py) | |
R13: ST(Px) → AAS(Px) |