Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of results comparing the performance of ‘apparent’ to five other parentage analysis tools in identifying the pairs of parents of 15 A. arguta offspring in a population of 77 individuals

From: ‘apparent’: a simple and flexible R package for accurate SNP-based parentage analysis in the absence of guiding information

Package/Tool

Analysis with no guiding information provided

Analysis guided with 2 genotypic classes: adults vs. offspring

Citation

Error I (%)

Error II (%)

Accuracy (%)

Time (min)

Error I (%)

Error II (%)

Accuracy (%)

Time (min)

apparent

0.0

0.0

100.0

18.4

0.0

0.0

100.0

3.1

hsphase (pogc)

31.0

5.7

17.4

0.1

31.0

5.7

17.4

0.1

Ferdosi et al. (2014) [30]

MasterBayes (MCMCped)

15.6

22.1

48.2

2.3

0.0

0.0

100.0

0.3

Hadfield et al. (2006) [27]

ParentOffspringa

44.4

0.0

55.6

260.4

6.3

0.0

93.8

28.9

Abdel-Haleem et al. (2013) [28]

Solomon

97.7

0.9

2.3

401.4

97.5

1.0

2.6

43.1

Christie et al. (2013) [29]

Cervus

74.6

0.0

50.9

11.9

0.0

0.0

100.0

5.3

Kalinowski et al. (2007) [44]

  1. aThe results from ParentOffspring are approximate because the package requires an a priori declaration of parental pairs for a given set of offspring (see main text)