Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the number of test cases of the benchmark dataset on which the algorithms achieve the lowest energy value. Comparison of the number of test cases of the benchmark dataset on which the algorithms achieve the lowest lRMSD value

From: Balancing multiple objectives in conformation sampling to control decoy diversity in template-free protein structure prediction

(a)

Evo-Diverse vs. others: 9 vs. 3 (mEA), 4 (mEA-PR), 3 (mEA-PR+PC), and 1 (Rosetta)

Evo-Diverse vs. mEA: 14 vs. 6

Evo-Diverse vs. mEA-PR: 11 vs. 9

Evo-Diverse vs. mEA-PR+PC: 12 vs. 8

Evo-Diverse vs Rosetta: 16 vs. 4

(b)

Evo-Diverse vs. others: 10 vs. 1 (mEA), 2 (mEA-PR), 1 (mEA-PR+PC), and 9 (Rosetta)

Evo-Diverse vs. mEA: 15 vs. 5

Evo-Diverse vs. mEA-PR: 14 vs. 6

Evo-Diverse vs. mEA-PR+PC: 15 vs. 5

Evo-Diverse vs Rosetta: 11 vs. 9

Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us