Table 4 Comparison of energy of the lowest energy decoy and average energy of the 10 best decoys (measured in Rosetta Energy Units – REUs) obtained by each algorithm on each of the 10 CASP domains
| Â | Â | Â | Lowest energy | Avg. of the best 10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Domain | CASP | Length | Rosetta | Evo-Diverse | Rosetta | Evo-Diverse |
T1008-D1 | 13 | 77 | − 164.2 | − 1 6 6 . 4 | − 162 | − 1 6 6 . 3 |
T0957s1-D1 | 13 | 108 | − 1 2 1 . 5 | − 112.6 | − 1 1 5 | − 112.6 |
T0892-D2 | 12 | 110 | − 101.8 | − 1 1 2 . 3 | − 94.1 | − 1 1 2 . 3 |
T0953s2-D3 | 13 | 93 | − 53.1 | − 6 7 . 6 | − 49.8 | − 6 6 . 3 |
T0960-D2 | 13 | 84 | − 79.7 | − 8 2 . 3 | − 79.4 | − 8 2 . 3 |
T0898-D2 | 12 | 55 | − 65.5 | − 6 6 . 7 | − 62.8 | − 6 6 . 7 |
T0859-D1 | 12 | 129 | − 9 9 . 5 | − 85.6 | − 9 0 . 7 | − 85.6 |
T0897-D1 | 12 | 138 | − 141.4 | − 1 4 7 . 4 | − 137.4 | − 1 4 7 . 4 |
T0886-D1 | 12 | 69 | − 8 9 . 2 | − 85.4 | − 84 | − 8 5 . 4 |
T0953s1-D1 | 13 | 67 | − 51.8 | − 5 9 | − 49.1 | − 5 9 |