Table 5 Comparison of lRMSD to the native structure of the lowest lRMSD decoy and average lRMSD to the native of the 10 best decoys (measured in Angstroms – Å) obtained by each algorithm on each of the 10 CASP domains
| Â | Â | Â | Lowest lRMSD | Avg. of the best 10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Domain | CASP | Length | Rosetta | Evo-Diverse | Rosetta | Evo-Diverse |
T1008-D1 | 13 | 77 | 3 . 2 | 3.5 | 3 . 4 | 3.8 |
T0957s1-D1 | 13 | 108 | 6 . 9 | 7.1 | 8.1 | 7 . 6 |
T0892-D2 | 12 | 110 | 8 | 7 . 4 | 8.5 | 7 . 6 |
T0953s2-D3 | 13 | 93 | 8.7 | 7 . 9 | 9.3 | 8 . 3 |
T0960-D2 | 13 | 84 | 7 . 2 | 7.3 | 7 . 6 | 7 . 6 |
T0898-D2 | 12 | 55 | 6.5 | 5 . 9 | 6.7 | 6 . 3 |
T0859-D1 | 12 | 129 | 10.6 | 9 . 4 | 11.3 | 9 . 9 |
T0897-D1 | 12 | 138 | 9 | 9.3 | 10.8 | 9 . 9 |
T0886-D1 | 12 | 69 | 6.3 | 6 . 2 | 6.8 | 6 . 6 |
T0953s1-D1 | 13 | 67 | 7 | 5 . 7 | 7.4 | 6 . 1 |