BMC Bioinformatics

Table 6 Comparison of TM-score of the highest TM-score decoy and average TM-score of the 10 best decoys obtained by each algorithm on each of the 10 CASP domains

From: Balancing multiple objectives in conformation sampling to control decoy diversity in template-free protein structure prediction

			Highest TM-score		Avg. of the best 10
Domain	CASP	Length	Rosetta	Evo-Diverse	Rosetta	Evo-Diverse
T1008-D1	13	77	0 . 6 1	0.59	0 . 5 7	0.55
T0957s1-D1	13	108	0 . 4 9	0.42	0 . 4 2	0.40
T0892-D2	12	110	0.45	0 . 5 0	0.42	0 . 4 7
T0953s2-D3	13	93	0 . 2 8	0.25	0 . 2 5	0 . 2 5
T0960-D2	13	84	0.37	0 . 3 9	0.35	0 . 3 8
T0898-D2	12	55	0 . 3 9	0.37	0 . 3 7	0.36
T0859-D1	12	129	0.30	0 . 3 4	0.29	0 . 3 3
T0897-D1	12	138	0.35	0 . 3 6	0.31	0 . 3 2
T0886-D1	12	69	0.42	0 . 4 5	0.40	0 . 4 1
T0953s1-D1	13	67	0 . 4 7	0.41	0 . 4 3	0.39

Highest values for each target are marked in bold

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com