Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison of GDT_TS score of the highest GDT_TS score decoy and average GDT_TS score of the 10 best decoys obtained by each algorithm on each of the 10 CASP domains

From: Balancing multiple objectives in conformation sampling to control decoy diversity in template-free protein structure prediction

   

Highest GDT_TS score

Avg. of the best 10

Domain

CASP

Length

Rosetta

Evo-Diverse

Rosetta

Evo-Diverse

T1008-D1

13

77

0 . 6 2

0.61

0 . 6 1

0.58

T0957s1-D1

13

108

0 . 4 3

0.39

0 . 3 9

0.37

T0892-D2

12

110

0.42

0 . 4 5

0.39

0 . 4 4

T0953s2-D3

13

93

0 . 3 1

0 . 3 1

0 . 2 7

0 . 2 7

T0960-D2

13

84

0.37

0 . 4 2

0.36

0 . 3 9

T0898-D2

12

55

0 . 4 6

0.44

0 . 4 5

0.43

T0859-D1

12

129

0.29

0 . 3 2

0.27

0 . 3 1

T0897-D1

12

138

0.30

0 . 3 1

0.26

0 . 2 8

T0886-D1

12

69

0.47

0 . 4 9

0.45

0 . 4 6

T0953s1-D1

13

67

0 . 5 0

0.46

0 . 4 8

0.45

  1. Highest values for each target are marked in bold