Table 8 p-values obtained by 1-sided Fisher’s and Barnard’s tests on the CASP dataset for head-to-head comparison of the algorithms on lowest energy and average energy of the best 10 decoys (a), lowest lRMSD and average lRMSD of the best 10 decoys (b), highest TM-score and average TM-score of the best 10 decoys (c), and highest GDT_TS score and average GDT_TS score of the best 10 decoys (d)
(a) | Test | Lowest energy | Avg. energy of the best 10 |
|  | Fisher’s | 0.08945 | 0.01151 |
|  | Barnard’s | 0.05789 | 0.005909 |
(b) | Test | Lowest lRMSD | Avg. lRMSD of the best 10 |
|  | Fisher’s | 0.3281 | 0.002739 |
|  | Barnard’s | 0.2617 | 0.001288 |
(c) | Test | Highest TM-score | Avg. TM-score of the best 10 |
|  | Fisher’s | 0.6719 | 0.5 |
|  | Barnard’s | 0.9991 | 0.4119 |
(d) | Test | Highest GDT_TS score | Avg. GDT_TS score of the best 10 |
|  | Fisher’s | 0.5 | 0.5 |
|  | Barnard’s | 0.4119 | 0.4119 |